Pella Chronicle

Letters to the editor

July 13, 2012

Writer responds to ruling

Pella — To the editor,

In his response (July 5) to the decision by the Supreme Court upholding the constitutionality of the Affordable Healthcare Act (ACA), Taylor Armerding salvages what he can, noting that the decision “gives voters a refreshingly clear choice this fall,” since “Republican Mitt Romney has promised to repeal [!] Obamacare on his first day in office.”  Singling out the most controversial feature of the act, the so-called individual mandate (IM) that requires individuals to purchase basic health insurance or face a penalty, Armerding predicts that “voters will be reminded that Obama was against the mandate before he was for it.”

Presumable they will also be reminded that Mitt Romney was for the individual mandate before he was against it.  The IM was after all a centerpiece of MassCare, the healthcare reform law enacted during Romney’s term as governor.  And Romney was an enthusiastic supporter of the IM.  If you doubt this, listen to his own voice on YouTube (“Mitt Romney First Introduces the Individual Mandate at Heritage in Jan. 2006”).  In 2007, after MassCare passed, Romney described the IM as “ultimate conservatism,” and credited the conservative Heritage Foundation with originating the idea.  In 2009, during the initial debates over the ACA, Romney wrote an Op-Ed piece for USAToday, urging Obama to adopt the IM and assuring him that congressional Republicans would flock to support the ACA if he did so (www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20090730/column30_st.art.htm).  As late as April 2010, Romney was glowing in his praise for the ACA’s inclusion of the IM.

Obama for his part was never actually against the IM; but initially his preference was for other policy solutions.  What made him change his mind?  Perhaps it was a pragmatic calculation that Romney might be right: the IM might be workable, and Republicans might be more inclined to support a bill that included it.  He was wrong on the second point, of course; but at least he attempted pragmatic bi-partisanship.

The more troubling question is this: What made Romney change his mind about the IM?  Until he explains this remarkable about-face, we’ll be stuck with the image of Romney shaking his Etch-A-Sketch, changing his fundamental positions out of pure electoral expediency, and asking the American people to elect – well, a blank slate.

David Timmer

Pella


 

1
Text Only
Letters to the editor
Features
Facebook
AP Video
Official: Air Algerie Flight 'probably Crashed' TSA Administrator on Politics and Flight Bans Raw: National Guard Helps Battle WA Wildfires Raw: Ukraine's Donetsk Residents Flee Senators Push to End Hamas Threat in Cease-Fire A Young Victim's Premonition, Hug Before MH17 U.N. School in Gaza Hit by Israeli Strike Raw: Deadly Storm Hits Virginia Campground Officials Warn of Avoidable Death in Hot Cars Death Penalty Expert: 'This is a Turning Point' House Committee at Odds Over Obama Lawsuit Raw: MH17 Victim's Bodies Arrive in Netherlands Raw: UN School Used As Shelter Hit by Tank Shell Raw: Gunmen Attack Iraqi Prison Convoy Plane Leaves Ukraine With More Crash Victims The Rock Brings Star Power to Premiere Raw: Families Travel to Taiwan Plane Crash Site Arizona Execution Takes Almost Two Hours Crash Kills Teen Pilot Seeking World Record
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Obituaries